Why Truehope insists on independent research

Shortly after Truehope founders, Anthony Stephan and David Hardy, discovered the Truehope formula, they realized it was critical that their discovery was validated by science. They finally found a researcher at the University of Calgary who was willing (but reluctant) to try EMPowerplus in a pilot study.

Twelve years later, EMPowerplus has been the subject of 19 academic papers, including case-control designs, case studies using with-subject crossover designs, open-label case series, case reports with extensive historical treatment information, large database analyses, and randomized controlled trials. And we’re still not satisfied. We’re excited sure, but we want as much research as possible to validate our anecdotal experience, so we have several other studies underway.

What all of this research has in common is that we have never paid a penny to any of the 34 researchers at 13 universities around the world who have studied our formula. This is important to us.

It’s important to us that those who research the Truehope formula do so out of a sincere desire to prove its validity. It’s important to us that research on the Truehope formula is never influenced by how much money we donate to the research. It’s important to us that the Truehope research is as objective as possible.

If you agree with us, why not check out our research?

Did you like this post? Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter to stay up to date on new posts.